Well, I took my car to go get dyno'd today! The motor is all broken in, and has been running well, so I
figured it was time. The reason I decided to dyno now is that: 1. I'm running a relatively small turbo. It's
much bigger than my last one, but not "that" big, as compared to what I plan on running. 2. I'm running
low boost, as the engine can handle nearly double what I'm throwing at it right now. 3. I haven't
upgraded a lot of things that will soon be upgraded. Things like a larger intercooler, larger intercooler
piping, a better flowing downpipe, and something to get around the 2.25" catalytic converter. Most of all,
I'm at this point still using the tried and true SDS. I wanted to put to rest ideas that the SDS doesn't work
well, or, isn't capable of power. I also wanted to see the difference, which should be huge, going to a
stand alone fuel system along with a WBo2.
So this gives me a baseling, low boost, low compression, crude engine management. Things can only get
better from here!
figured it was time. The reason I decided to dyno now is that: 1. I'm running a relatively small turbo. It's
much bigger than my last one, but not "that" big, as compared to what I plan on running. 2. I'm running
low boost, as the engine can handle nearly double what I'm throwing at it right now. 3. I haven't
upgraded a lot of things that will soon be upgraded. Things like a larger intercooler, larger intercooler
piping, a better flowing downpipe, and something to get around the 2.25" catalytic converter. Most of all,
I'm at this point still using the tried and true SDS. I wanted to put to rest ideas that the SDS doesn't work
well, or, isn't capable of power. I also wanted to see the difference, which should be huge, going to a
stand alone fuel system along with a WBo2.
So this gives me a baseling, low boost, low compression, crude engine management. Things can only get
better from here!
WOW! An absolutely drop dead georgous day out
here! So much for "ugly, nasty Los Angeles...."
here! So much for "ugly, nasty Los Angeles...."
